Road Map to Iran Strike: In Either Case, Israel will ‘Pay’
Geopolitics consists of a series of feints within feints, threats and counter-threats mixed with mutual back-scratching. But someone always pays the piper and, notwithstanding the old phrase, it is rarely he who calls the tune. That was then, but this is the age of terminal Machiavellianism when doing evil means never having to say you’re sorry when you’re big enough to make others pay for your power trip and mistakes.
What is called “the Georgian crisis” contains a series of long-brewing tit-for-tats with a substantial quantum of cooperation between the larger belligerents, whose belligerence appears to be increasing, — at the expense of others, of course. Russia’s invasion in support of secessionist Islamic groups in the South Ossetia and Abkhazia regions of Georgia is both a reprisal for and an imitation of NATO’s support for jihad in the Balkans, its dismembering of Eastern Orthodox Serbia and the creation of Muslim states like Kosovo. Russia also professes anger at the spread of NATO’s missile defenses to Poland, Georgia and potentially Ukraine. Surely it does not expect to be attacked from Poland or Georgia although with the enthusiasts of negative population growth clustered in top policy positions it could happen. But there is another ‘mate’ to this end game…
There also is an oil aspect. Georgia’s attempt to retain its territorial integrity, new-minted in 1991 involves a BP (British Petroleum) pipeline from Baku in Azerbaijan across Georgia to northeastern Turkey for transshipment throughout the West. The Russians demanded that BP shut its pipeline; after a train laden with fuel tankers was turned to an inferno by Russian mines, BP complied. Shifting its irritation and feeling of entitlement further southeast, Russia announced that it would resume work on Iran nuclear facility at Bushehr, with work on the plutonium creating plant expected by year’s end. “If nobody wants to talk with us on these issues [Georgia and Iran], and Russia’s cooperation is not needed [to halt Iranian weapon’s development] than for God’s sake do it yourself” said PM Putin [1].
“Do it yourself” sounds like an invitation, perhaps prearranged by a series of ‘trades.’
What will Anglo-America get in response for Russian assertions of power and rage? As Mr. Putin indicated, a veiled green light to strike Iran; the Iranians seemed to be listening for the next day their Deputy Defense Minister threatened that an attack on Iran will lead “to a new world war” [2]. In recent weeks Russia has sent and promised Syria advanced missile and radar systems and has begun constructing a major Mediterranean port for itself at Tartus in northern Syria that could deter operations by the US Sixth Fleet. But this dredging operation could be ended by Israel in the backwash of an American strike on Iran, which certainly will be sold by the media as the US saving Israel. Bigots will howl that this is more ‘evidence’ that Israel controls American foreign policy, or even the policy of the world. This irrational but seemingly ineradicable slant waxes in proportion as undertakers like Olmert ‘outsource’ Israel’s crises to powers that intend its dissolution…
As the pack howls, Condoleeza Rice is pushing plans for the expulsion of Jews from most of ancient Jerusalem and pressing for every administration’s beau ideal, a “Palestinian” State, a fictional entity that never will cohere for it has no historical basis and does not even meet the UN-international standards for a state. If and when America does strike Iran, “to save Israel” (after forbidding and forcibly preventing Israel from saving itself, — for sixty years) [3], Israel will be pressed to gratefully pay for this salvation by yielding Jerusalem and 95% of the Jewish heartland. And if there is no American strike, then this is the goal of the administration and its perennial State Department faction in any case. The looming strike on Iran is simply more ‘proof’ of how much Israel ‘owes’ America, its “only friend.”
On August 31, Debkafile reports an American strike on Iran coming within a few weeks [4]. Israel’s air force will be held back for two reasons: as a client state, it must not take initiatives even when its survival is at stake; to keep the force near Israel to deal with the massive missile-radar complexes deployed in Syria and Lebanon, and an upsurge in attacks from Hamastan (“the Gaza strip”). In the meantime, the increased Russian arming of Syria, its port and naval activities, Iran and Syria’s installation on Lebanon’s second tallest peak of radar that dominates the eastern Mediterranean and Israel insures that Israel may suffer a significant blow, as in 1973 and 2006; this would be all the more reason for a battered state to acquiesce to the pre-arranged outcome of surrender of Judea and Samaria, seized by Britain’s Arab Legion and Iraqi army in 1948 and smothering of Jerusalem beneath an international administration as planned by the western powers since 1937 at least. The purpose of the Olmert regime and its otherwise impossible longevity is that it facilitates this long-established solution to the Jewish problem; from Churchill to Alice Bailey they consider it the ultimate solution.
Since a “Palestinian” state will be a volatile fiction, the powers likely will satisfy themselves initially with re-partition of Jerusalem which explains the Israel Land Administration’s alienation of Jewish land, held in trust by the JNF and now covered with illegal Arab buildings. The powers then will proceed to the “Fertile Crescent” – Arab Federation which has been the goal of the British since 1915; the “Zionist” Lloyd George traded the headwaters and tributaries of the Jordan and the Litani basin to the French sphere of influence for oil and rail rights, and eventual nation-building in Mesopotamia [5] which brings us to the present day American operation Iraqi Freedom the proximate catalyst for the re-arrangement of the Middle East.
Anglo-America will get preferential oil concessions, approximating the original Anglo-Persian oil holdings (that became BP) in exchange for what happens to its pipeline in Georgia. The Persians will be liberated from the mullahs and dar al Islam will get what the West wants, too: an excoriated Israel. Everybody wins except the Jews: the main motif of the modern world, indeed since the council of Nicea, continues to play.
As NATO and Russian fleets jostle each other in the Black Sea and a pipeline exchange and regime change in Iran take place a long-planned “new middle East” emerges along with a partitioned Jerusalem that will give new meaning to the term, “Vatican II.” It will be just in time for the beatification of Hitler’s Pope [6].
1. Debkafile report of August 30, 2008 quoting comments by Putin of August 28. Mr. Putin also put off a projected ‘summit meeting’ with President Bush; www.Debka.com August 29, 2008
2. www.Debka.com August 30, 2008 and reports in Israel National News, August 29, 2008
3. In July 1948, the US-GB-UN imposed a ceasefire, arranged with Ben Gurion, when Israel was about to capture Jerusalem, Samuel Katz, Days of Fire (NY 1968), 251-82; in January 1949, Anglo-America and the communist/globalist UN pressed for another ceasefire as Israel was poised to destroy the Egyptian army and recapture the entire “Gaza strip” and much of the Sinai peninsula; in 1956-7, the US forced Israel out of the Sinai; in 1967, America had plans to attack Israel if its victory went too far, for example, the Gilead and south Lebanon; in 1973 the US demanded that Israel absorb the Syrian-Egyptian first strike and, two weeks later, the US announced it would shoot down Israeli planes if it did not allow the encircled Egyptian third army to go free; in 1982, the US – UN demanded that Arafat and the PLO go free from Beirut and that Israel withdraw from Lebanon, which led to the murder of several hundred Americans by Hezbollah, which led not only to the missile attacks of 2006 but the entire Oslo-Road Map process to the truncation of Israel and complete end of its tattered sovereignty. This is a short list.
4. Debka citing reports from Dutch intelligence operatives that had penetrated the Iranian program for several years and identified detailed key points, Joost de Haas in De Telegraaf.
5. Samuel Katz, Days of Fire, 261-2, “we were at the height of our victories, from the Litani River in the north to the heart of the Sinai Desert,” Yigal Alon of 1948-9; Katz, Lone Wolf: A Biography of Zev Jabotinsky (NY 1996), 315 – 328 on ‘the trade’ and the variations and ultimate weakening of the Balfour Declaration; for the rejection of even the watered-down Declaration by American Secretary of State Lansing, see Katz, the Aaronsohn Saga (2000, 2006), 308. See reports in Ha’Aretz, spring 2008 about the preliminary federation of Syria, Lebanon, Israel and Jordan before its fusion with the de facto federation called “Iraq.” Egypt and the Saudis initially will be perturbed but both will delight in regime change in Iran that limits its apocalyptic ambitions. Russia will be pleased by the Federation’s integration in the EU, via the Mediterranean Union, which it controls through its own energy resources and which it pervades with its collectivist-postmodernist ideologies.
6. John Cornwell, Hitler’s Pope: the Secret History of Pius XII (NY 1999) 46-58, 96-192 passim; in addition to the evidence of continuing Roman anti-Semitism, note the abundant evidence on the role of the Vatican, and Pacelli in particular for contributing to the start of both World Wars with concordats that increased the imperial aspects of the Papacy even when at the expense of Catholic nations, institutions and populations. See Cornwell, 248-60 on Pius XII’s “benevolence” to the Ante Pavelic – Cardinal Stepinac Ustashe regime and the detailed reports of Jared Israel on www.tenc.com the Emperor’s New Clothes. The neo-pagan creed of Rome is based on the damnation, subjugation and humiliation of Jews. The more absurd its claims (credo quia absurdum Aquinas summed it up) the more ferociously it demands that the Jews admit that its mad magic is true.