Crisis and Solution
The closing recommendations may surprise but they suit the times. To truly please the British and Americans, Israel must change its government and radically revise its suicidal policies.
The financial-diplomatic interests that determine the foreign policies of Britain and America still pursue the outline sketched in 1919 for British policy in the Middle East. This policy was interrupted only briefly by Israel’s war for independence in 1948 and its great victory in 1967, a victory whose fruits were aborted.
The plan envisioned a Jewish majority region west of the Jordan as part of an Arab Federation. Sir Alfred Milner opposed this “absorption” of the Jews by the Arabs and argued for Jewish autonomy within Commonwealth status. But Milner died in 1925 and views like those of John Dove, Lord Halifax, the Astors and Reginald Coupland prevailed. Not only is Milner’s view that Israel west of the Jordan River “must never become a Jewish state” being carried out, but so is its absorption into an Arab Federation in which Jews may live provided they make major contributions with labor, capital and industry and don’t mind being regularly pillaged… 
What’s the way out? Let’s look first at where the British proposed to place Jews then.
Look at the Peel Commission’s 1937 Partition proposal drawn up as an afterthought (to appease Jewish sensibilities) and one may see the logic and basis for what is being done to Jews in Israel since Camp David and especially in its final Oslo-Road Map era to this day.
This map shows the entire Negev and all of Judea and the west coast north to Ashdod as part of an Arab state (“Palestine” or “Greater Syria” or, perhaps, Egypt; in the 1950s the British called this “plan alpha”). This state also is to include the entirety of Judea and Samaria. All of Jerusalem is to be an internationalized region extending to the port at Jaffo (old Tel Aviv).
This plan accords with American Presidents’ ongoing refusal to confirm Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and also with events of recent weeks whose logic, along with the pawns to carry them out, have been germinating for decades. Low lights of this process were the US pressing Israel out of the Sinai and compelling it to acknowledge the existence of a “Palestinian people”; intervention to save the PLO from Beirut in 1982; the Oslo accords and emplacement of the PLO throughout Judea and Samaria; and the Road Map (2001) banning further Jewish settlement there.
The Hamas war on Israel of late June 2006 was an extension of these goals. It began with a raid on an Israeli border guard position. The attackers came through a tunnel built from an area Israel had regained in 1967. They were able to do this because Ariel Sharon, an Anglo-American pawn and fervent Anglophile expelled all the Jews from the towns and farms they had built in the area and crushed their homes as ordered by America’s Secretary of State. Before that expulsion of August 2005, the Jews in those towns were subject to five years of mortar and rifle fire and road mines which the IDF did little to stop. The message to the Jewish settlers was ‘leave: we won’t protect you.’ Part of this entire Anglo-American process is that the Israeli armed forces are being effectively disarmed be having leftist-internationalists fill its upper echelons. This is reflected in a “Defense Minister” that “applauds” the news that a new Arab town is being planned between Beit El and Shechem even as he prepares to destroy more Jewish towns and expel the Jews. A self-hating sponge earns no chits from its masters…
The tunnels from the now Jew-free Gaza strip have spread throughout the western Negev. Jews in towns miles from the border can hear the Arabs digging beneath them. But the army, crippled by the sponges that control it does nothing. Jewish farmers in the southern Judean hills (and also in the north) are robbed repeatedly by marauding Bedouins, the same Arabs that the JNF remains “committed” to helping with money raised from American Jews. The Arabs poison the guard dogs of Jewish farmers, steal thousands of sheep, cows and goats and attack the Jewish farmers themselves. The police do nothing; or rather, as British troops and police used to do in the 1930s, the police arrive and prevent Jewish farmers from defending their land as happened February 13 at the Talia farm near Sussia in south Judea. The farms’ plantings were uprooted under the eye of international leftwing organizations and the police. A week earlier, farmer Shai Dromi whose farm has been repeatedly robbed of its animals and his dogs poisoned was arrested and charged with manslaughter for shooting one of the Arabs who again had broken into his sheepfold at 3am. Such events led to the murder of Dov Dribben in 1997.
So Dromi, the victim is charged with murder while the murderers go free; it’s the peace process in small. Thousands demonstrate but it seems futile. The flocks are gone; the dogs are dead; the surviving farmers fear defending themselves. The message to Jews in the Negev is clear: stay at your own risk, the State will not help you. What you thought was your state, a Jewish state, wants you out just like the ruling elites of Anglo-America who use the jihadist mania of Islam to keep the pot simmering.
The battle for a Jewish State suffered a major blow at the Temple Mount in June 1967 when Moshe Dayan abdicated control of it to the Muslims. By 2000 the situation was so bad that Jews were able to ascend only by one gate (the Mughrabi Gate from the Western Wall plaza) and only for four hours a day, five days a week. From October 2000 till summer 2003 Arab violence led not to suppression of that violence but to banning Jewish ascent to the certain delight of the Vatican whose head, Pius XII managed to get through WW II without explicitly mentioning the slaughter of the Jews. How far does the fix go? The ostensibly Jewish mayor of Jerusalem reportedly compared Jews ascending to the Temple Mount to “urinating in public.” It’s not difficult to see how this politician got his position. During the past week, amidst ongoing repairs to this one path from the Western Wall Plaza to the mount the Muslims rioted using the claim, popularized by Amin al Husseini that “al Aksa was under attack.” (That the al Aksa mosque is not even at the Temple Mount is beyond the scope of this essay). True to form, after a day of vacillating, the expulsion government capitulated and suspended the work. There is now no path for Jews to ascend to the Mount, much less pray there.
How can the media sell such cravens, lies, and injustice in Israel, America and Europe? Since WW I, the J.P. Morgan and Rockefeller interests in America have bought mass media, editors and reporters either directly or through advertising.1) The same process, driven by the Rhodes-Milner Round Table already was under way in Britain.2) Since the era of the treacherous Jimmy Carter the control of these groups over the media in the Anglophone world has become all but complete, reaching from the network to the local level. Alternative media are few, far between, with meager resources and constantly pressed in various ways to move to the internationalist, anti-American and anti-Israel camp. The cycle of lies rises higher: truth trembles on the verge of disappearance.
We may be very near the day when no Jews may ascend the Temple Mount without Vatican as well as Waqf permission. Or perhaps not even live in the “Jewish Quarter (about one-sixth actually, made by Britain in 1936) of the old city of Jerusalem, the inner capital of the Jewish people since the times of Solomon, twenty-nine centuries ago. The Vatican “permanent working commission” on making Jerusalem a “World Heritage Peace Center” continues. Mr. Olmert and his government are on board. All those within this government or refusing to bring it down are part of the game and hoping to be on the winning team.
Before proposing a resolution to this crisis let us note that the conflict with Hizbollah of July 12 – August 20, 2006 followed the pattern and means laid down by the Round Table in the 1920s, especially after the death of Milner. For six years, since globalist-stooge, Ehud Barak ordered to Israeli army out of the narrow buffer zone above Israel’s northern border the IDF watched as Iran and Syria built Hizbollah into a serious military force supplied with thousands of rockets. As Israel’s Deputy Chief of Military Intelligence stated early in the conflict, “agreements with the international community specified that Israel would absorb the first blow” (3). The fact that the Israeli army was willing for six years to watch this proceed without preemption and that even now, months after the end of the ceasefire war that wrecked Israel’s deterrence the top echelons of the Army and government have not been cleaned out show that the expulsion and surrender regime remains in place and committed to the untenable position of John Dove-Bevin. Jews again are being led like sheep to the slaughter, in this case defined for starters as an Arab Federation in which it will be veritable open season on Jews. Dissenting remarks by “friendly” insiders like former CIA chief James Woolsey are just that, a few crumbs laced with anesthetic for Jews who exile has trained to expect the worst.
Hizbollah has rearmed, they are supported by Eurabian troops and the American regime continues to fund, arm and train Fatah which is dedicated to the complete eradication of Israel per the British plan for a unitary Arab Federation from Baghdad to Cairo. But Oceania still wants things from the Jews: an expanded community of interests can be achieved that will change the current situation substantially.
As expulsion hangs over the Jews of Migron, scarcely ten miles north of Jerusalem, with the Road Map demanding the removal of nearly all Jews from Judea and Samaria, for starters, the following is a proactive plan to enhance Israel’s value to the “fellowship of English-speaking nations” and therefore secure genuine alliance with the grand design…
There is already a regionalized world system dominated by the Anglo-American nations or, rather, by the interests that run them despite their own traditions. The Berlin-Vatican-Paris axis is a major player and partner in this community of interests, as are Russia, China and Japan; but the Anglophone nations are the main wealth producers and it is their ruling interests who primarily direct the show, that is, the interrelation of the pieces. To increase its value to these interests Israel must expand its borders substantially: through all of the Lebanon, the western half of “Jordan” (the rest can be ceded to Saudi Arabia)4 and the entire “Gaza strip.” Indeed, so long as it stays away from the Suez Canal, there would be multi-faceted financial and geopolitical benefits from Israel cleaning the Sinai of Al Qaeda and Islamic Jihad, developing the oil fields there (with concessions for American companies of course) and helping NATO police the region including east-central Africa. The powers want to see productivity and battles: money and military assistance; they are not interested in appeals or arguments, no matter how cogent about justice or treaties. Anyone who treads the path of “signed agreements,” “accords” and “guarantees” is heading into a dead wall canyon.
The leaders of an Israel that wants to endure must make clear to all relevant parties that expanding and securing its turf is being done as part of Israel’s support for and integration into the fraternal alliance of Anglophone nations. It should proclaim, not request, Commonwealth status and grant numerous privileges to members of the commonwealth, America and native English speakers.
The interests that rule the main blocs do not care about the “Palestinians” whom they have created and use to keep Israel and the entire Middle East in crisis. When Israel cleans them away from itself (they can decide where they want to go) the condemnations will steadily diminish, — if Israel ignores them. The interests that rule the powers are interested in productivity (so they can spread it around – their own citizens already are breaking or have broken under the strain of Globalism), military assistance and blood. Israel should deal with Syria, settle the Lebanon with Jews and sweep out and suppress violent elements, and allow America to withdraw safely from Mesopotamia if that’s what its leaders choose to do. Then Israel will be in position to deal with Iran on its own, without American involvement. This will displease some sectors of the internationalist crisis-fomenters but satisfy others: they can always make a new mess in South America, central or western Africa or Southeast Asia (which they already are on record as wanting Israel to help feed with agricultural technologies). The killing will continue but be distanced from centers of Jewish productivity and settlement. This is the maximal current resolution to the crisis in the Middle East; it enlists the irresistible dynamics of Globalism on behalf of necessarily limited Jewish sovereignty.
Whether or not “the only hope for the world’s future” resides in “the oceanic commonwealth of free nations” (5) it is clear that Israel’s present hopes do. Better that it be via the Milner+ option described above. Judaism too sees the world united and turned toward Jerusalem for productivity and stability.
When this is done simultaneously with open acceptance of Dominion status as a Jewish majority region or Israel will become a benefit not a patsy, pawn and excuse. It will strengthen those parts of Anglo-America that prefer their own approach to that of the EU-Vatican and win Israel as much acceptance as it needs. It would maximize the Jewish contribution to balancing the regionalized world system “by conquest or by consent” as James Warburg testified to Congress in June 1940. The ways to do this are by aggressive expansion, productivity and self-definition as a Jewish majority commonwealth. This will greatly enlarge its place within the fellowship so its agencies can operate freely, openly and productively; that’s the winning hand for now.
1. G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island (2002, 4th edition), 244-5
2. Carroll Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment (1981), 33-55 passim; Rhodes: “we discussed various projects for propaganda, the formation of libraries, creation of lectureships, the acquisitions of a newspaper …for federation, expansion and consolidation of the empire” (1894). “Milner…favored the method of quiet propaganda, political and economic influence behind the scenes, and the control of journalistic, educational and propaganda agencies.”
3. Major General Ya’akov Amidror, israelnationalnews.com July 14, 2006
4. Diplomatic communications from 1970, de-classified six years ago showed the British quite willing to let King Hussein and “Jordan” fall to the PLO.
5. Foreign Affairs, 1941 quoted by James Perloff, The Shadows of Power (1986), 66