State of the Union: Text and Subtext
A short answer regarding the State of the Union of nominally sovereign states within the American Federal Republic [rip] is that it is very grave. Structurally, it has become an oligarchy, a debased form of aristocracy (“rule of the best”). Those who follow judicial events and the intervention of courts, drug cartels and government in every sphere of life – family, medicine, education, finance – know that America’s Constitution and culture have been vitiated.
Most of the people applauding or sulking on the evening of January 23 are deeply engaged in this ruin; some of them have the wit to know it. But they’re safely inside: we are in the crosshairs. When the State is god, dissent is heresy.
Let’s focus on a few things said and unsaid in the State of the Union address of 2007. The speech, the entire gesamkunstwerk of the evening represents a few steps further down that line of proud and grim monarchs quoted from The Magician’s Nephew in my previous essay.
According to Mr. Bush, what happened in the Middle East during 2005 was that the Iraqi [sic] people made great strides toward freedom; various people in the Lebanon sought to organize a ‘democracy’ in that other artificial nation; and our moderate Arab allies… What did not happen, officially, during 2005 was that, under the reiterated instructions of the American State Department (which runs by its own agenda on which Mr. Bush is occasionally briefed so he can comment) the client government in Jerusalem uprooted ten thousand Jews from their homes, farms and communities in Gush Katif and northern Samaria so that they could be replaced by jihadists. Thus the War on Terror will continue, as Mr. Bush said, long after we have turned the reigns of leadership over to others.
That’s the plan; it’s a war of attrition, a means of population control in the familiar and the literal sense. Please recall, Secretary of State Jadis C. Rice stated that “there could be no greater legacy for America than to help create a Palestinian State.”
If Israel was not prevented from consolidating its victories there would be no war on terror. That’s why each of its victories had to be undone, and they have been.
That a “Palestinian State” is a prime good of American foreign policy also was clear in the President’s brief overview of the spread of “terrorism” in 2006 (he means jihad). There was terrible violence between Shiite and Sunni extremists in “Iraq,” why, even a great Shiite holy place in Samara was attacked. The regime in Iran is supporting terrorism (fancy that) and with Syria arranged the murder of Pierre Gemayal in the Lebanon. And, he added, Hizbollah “ignited broader conflict in the region.”
How sweet: Israel’s semi-official new name is “the region.” It will elide smoothly into the “New Middle East” long planned by the policy shapers of Britain as a key part of the imperial federalism touted by Cecil Rhodes et al. Jews will work, invent, build, feed, heal and protect others, exporting technology everywhere and they will die protecting the death of Jewish sovereignty within a regionalized world system.
“The region” is code: what the President meant but didn’t say (because his speech writers didn’t write it) is that Hizbollah attacked Israel for five weeks with rocket barrages, more strikes than all the V-I and V-2 rockets Germany shot on England in WW II. Hundreds of thousands of Jews had to flee their homes and live in shelters. We already have discussed the reason this was not a “humanitarian crisis” – Jews are not human. As a British official explained in 1948, “Israel is not a state and therefore cannot be invaded.” Some things never change.
Given the corrupt nature of the mass media, of most of those who eat it, of the oligarchs who dance for it, of the puppet masters, jihadists and silk hats alike who run the show according to the principle, “one hand washes the other” it’s probably better for Jews that the words “Israel” and “Jewish people” were not mentioned. Western and Islamic Jew-haters have created a situation where a significant number of people, unable to read a map, ignorant of history think that the entire nightmare of our times is being manipulated by Jews. (That’s why Israelis can’t travel or live freely in Judea or the Shomron; that’s why Jews can’t pray on the Temple Mount).
In our better Colleges and Universities, the first term of European History, origins, includes the “Code of Hammurabi” but nothing about the Books of Moses or the Jews.
So given the rule of the lie perhaps it was better that Israel wasn’t mentioned; except, it was mentioned, once, as an adjunct to that more important word, “Palestine,” a lie embodied. I paraphrase, “we remain dedicated to creating a Palestinian State to live in freedom and peace with Israel.” The fact that this state will become Judenrein as its Arab proponents tirelessly assert, the fact that Judaism’s holiest places will be within this “Palestinian” state was not mentioned by the chief oligarch.
How apt that the “Palestine,” a lie embodied is the cause celebre of the “United Nations,” itself a lie and prototype for the World Security State whose creation was justified to “punish” (in law courts) a few of the mass murderers of the Jewish people in lieu of rescuing any Jews during the shoah.
Let us note a connection of these matters to the issue of immigration and “securing” America’s southern borders. The chief oligarch declared himself against amnesty but for “a comprehensive immigration bill” (that’s why the Democrats all got up and applauded) which includes various kinds of amnesty and continued infusion of Mexican workers, legal and illegal. But during WW II, America was “too full” even to fill the quota on Jewish immigration (55,000 / year), much less to exceed it, given the circumstances. And now Judea and Samaria are “too full” of Jews (about 250,000) although its vast empty expanses, the heartland of the Jewish people are waiting for them to develop it.
In 1923, in a speech to the House of Lords, Sir Alfred Milner, de facto head of the Royal Institute for International Affairs and the Round Table seminar, media and publication consortium (funded by J.P Morgan and the Carnegie Institute as well as the Cecil Rhodes estate) conceded that Jewish areas of Palestine always would be productive and Arab areas always unproductive. Nevertheless, he declared that “there must never be a Jewish state” and reiterated his group’s support for “an Arab federation” (this is what Americans are fighting and paying for today) and a “homeland” for Jews with Commonwealth status, the “Imperial Federalism” for which Rhodes, Milner, Toynbee, and the dozens of notables in their groups tirelessly pushed. It is the forerunner of the World Security State run by an Anglo-American elite that has expanded to become multi-cultural and ecumenical in the worst ways.
A last word on Mexico, Americans and the chief Oligarch’s signal omissions: he did not mention his executive orders and agreements with foreign heads of state to merge the Social Security System with that of Mexico (save Social Security? nope) to erase borders and create a North American Union subdivided into regions each with its own capital.
Regarding the interminable War on Terror, the war on life and limited government, let us recall that Bertrand Russell stated that “a scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government” (1953). Russell who we were taughta was a great pacifist wrote that “war has been disappointing in controlling population, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective.” Jacques Cousteau, who had his own TV show promoting love of weird fish and coral reefs told UNESCO that “the world’s population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people a day” (1991). The Club of Rome, entwined with many “environmental” groups agrees that “the real enemy is humanity” (1991).
We’ve been reviewing some of the latest official lies and the agenda their surface of frothy applause hides like pleasant waves hide a jagged reef. The latest State of the Union is another piece of evidence that the oligarchs favor the pyramid over the Temple Mount, the United Nations over the covenant of Sinai, favor death over life. “Another possible surrogate for war [in reducing population] is the reintroduction of slavery, consistent with modern technology and political processes” like the mass media (“Report from Iron Mountain,” 1966).
The War on Terror is perfect; jihad is the ultimate bacillus or virus; it needs only to be fed which the oligarchs of many nations have done and do; then the war system and security to insure population control arrives on its white or should one say, pale horse.
Whatever you do, blame it all on the Jews and make sure to keep them from settling their land, especially its holiest places. That might produce real instead of rhetorical freedom, honorable modesty rather than imperial pride, and genuine peace rather than peace processes.
The oligarchy always will prefer the pyramid to the citizen farmer and his inalienable plot of land; will prefer debt-supported fiat money to fair weights and measures (the shekel is both a coin and specific weight). So Israel must go; the process of erasure begins and ends in corruption of language, thought and heart. As Orwell wrote, “the past was erased, the erasure was forgotten; the lie became truth.” That’s the State of the Union as we move toward a regionalized world system and reintroduction of slavery.